Trump Just Stripped Dr. Fauci Of VERY Expensive Package

President Trump’s decision to end Dr. Anthony Fauci’s government-funded security detail has ignited a heated debate over the financial responsibilities of protecting former officials.

At a Glance

  • President Trump canceled Dr. Fauci’s taxpayer-funded security detail
  • Fauci hired private security following the cancellation
  • Trump argues government employees can’t have indefinite security details
  • Fauci received $15 million in taxpayer-funded security over two years after leaving office
  • The former official insists he committed no crime amid pardon controversies

Trump’s Decision Sparks Controversy

In a move that has stirred controversy, President Donald Trump has canceled Dr. Anthony Fauci’s taxpayer-funded security detail. This decision has thrust the issue of post-service protection for former government officials into the spotlight, raising questions about who should bear the financial burden of such security measures.

Trump’s Rationale and Fauci’s Response

President Trump justified his decision by emphasizing the temporary nature of government-provided security for former officials. He argued that such protection cannot be indefinite and should eventually cease.

In response to the security cancellation and amid swirling controversies, Dr. Fauci has taken steps to ensure his personal safety by hiring his own security detail. This development has raised eyebrows, particularly given Fauci’s status as the highest-paid federal employee in 2019, with earnings of $417,608.

The Taxpayer Burden

The financial implications of providing security for former officials have come under scrutiny. A Freedom of Information Act request revealed that Dr. Fauci received approximately $15 million in taxpayer-funded security services over two years after returning to private citizenship. This substantial sum does not include costs incurred from April 2020 to December 2022, when Fauci was still in government service.

The discovery of this security arrangement has sparked debate about the appropriate allocation of public funds for the protection of former government employees. It has also raised questions about the duration and extent of such security measures, especially for individuals who are no longer serving in official capacities.

Fauci’s Defense Amid Pardon Controversy

As discussions about security costs continue, Dr. Fauci finds himself addressing another controversy regarding a potential preemptive pardon. In response, Fauci has vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

“Let me be perfectly clear. I have committed no crime and there are no possible grounds for any allegation or threat of criminal investigation or prosecution of me,” he stated.