REVEALED: New FBI Document EXPOSES Russiagate Origins

The FBI’s investigation into former President Donald Trump’s alleged Russia connections, known as “Russiagate,” continues to stir controversy as newly released documents raise more questions than answers.

At a Glance

  • A heavily redacted FBI document details a counterintelligence probe of Trump as a potential Russian agent
  • The investigation was initiated by then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and approved by FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap
  • Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia
  • The Steele Dossier, funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, played a role in the FBI’s concerns about Trump
  • Critics argue the investigation lacked substantial evidence and was politically motivated

FBI’s Russiagate Investigation: Unveiling the Redacted Details

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has recently released a heavily redacted document in response to a Freedom of Information request, shedding light on its controversial counterintelligence probe of former President Donald Trump as a potential Russian agent. This investigation, launched shortly after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, aimed to determine if Trump was acting on behalf of Russia and if he obstructed any FBI investigations.

The probe was initiated by then-acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and approved by FBI Assistant Director Bill Priestap. However, the official reason for the May 2017 investigation remains redacted, leaving many questions unanswered. Critics argue that the investigation was largely premised on dubious claims, prominently featuring the Steele Dossier, which many contend lacked substantial evidence.

The Steele Dossier and Its Controversial Role

The Steele dossier, funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign, played a significant role in the FBI’s concerns about Trump. Despite discrediting Steele’s information, the FBI re-engaged with the dossier’s author, Christopher Steele. This decision has drawn criticism and raised questions about the investigation’s integrity.

“The idea is, if the President committed obstruction of justice, fired the Director of the FBI to negatively impact or to shut down our investigation of Russia’s malign activity and possibly in support of his campaign, as a counterintelligence investigator you have to ask yourself, ‘Why would a president of the United States do that?’ So all those same sorts of facts cause us to wonder is there an inappropriate relationship, a connection between this president and our most fearsome enemy, the government of Russia,” Andrew McCabe said.

McCabe’s public statements suggest the investigation was motivated by Trump’s firing of Comey, rather than concrete evidence of Russian ties. This has led to accusations that the FBI’s actions were driven by a vendetta over Comey’s firing and the controversial Steele Dossier.

Mueller Investigation Findings

The investigation was part of the Special Counsel investigation led by Robert Mueller. Despite the intense scrutiny, Mueller’s report “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities,” Robert Mueller said.

This conclusion has led many to question the basis of the initial investigation and criticize the FBI’s handling of the matter. Critics argue that the FBI has not disclosed the “articulable factual basis” for its 2017 probe into Trump as a Russian intelligence asset, further fueling skepticism about the investigation’s legitimacy.

Calls for Transparency and Accountability

As Donald Trump re-enters the White House with a pledge to end national security state overreach, there is growing pressure on the FBI to disclose more information about the investigation. The public remains unaware of the full reasons behind the FBI’s follow-up counterintelligence probe targeting Trump, leading to calls for a full accounting to the American people.

The ongoing controversy surrounding “Russiagate” underscores the need for transparency and accountability in high-level investigations. As the debate continues, the FBI faces scrutiny over its handling of the investigation and the potential political motivations behind it. The American public awaits further revelations that may shed light on this complex and contentious chapter in recent political history.